Last updateFri, 04 Jul 2014 5pm Sees ASPCA Conspiracy in Cane Corso Killing

rottweiler Sees ASPCA Conspiracy in Changing Breed
Of Dog In Cane Corso Killing

As you know, I have been following's reporting of the Cane Corso incident.  Apparently, they see a conspiracy by the ASPCA in trying to change the dog breed involved from a Pit Bull to a Cane Corso (Yes, I know Pit Bull is not a breed of dog).  Here is a quote from their site on the issue:

Initially, we were concerned that the ASPCA -- a Manhattan-based pro-pit bull group -- would try to pull a fast one by mislabeling the breed.

They go on to to say:

Our concern now is Dread, who has no "cane corso" friends on Facebook, but plenty of pit bull friends, primarily bully breeders. Craven Desires' aptly theorizes that Dread's corso-cross was used in bully kennel breeding operations.

There is absolutely no evidence to support any of these allegations.  The ASPCA would put in jeopardy their credibility by labeling a Pit Bull a Cane Corso?  In a fatal incident that will see and has seen a tremendous amount of publicity? Incredible allegations.

The breeding "theory" is based on the owner's Facebook friends? Note the implication that again, the dog involved is a Cane Corso cross-not simply a Cane Corso.  This is simply a backdoor attempt to reclassify what has now been agreed by all the media to be a Cane Corso.  And by coupling the dog involved with Pit Bull breeding, they can now justify the Pit Bull label. Of course, the fact that there is not one shred of evidence of such facts does not stop them from trying to poison the well before real facts become available.

Is this any way to present an objective analysis of the breed involved and the facts surrounding this tragic incident?

Hide comment form Hide comment form

  2000 Characters left